Patent Infringement Blog

Monday, February 6, 2017

Top Attorneys in 2016

Posted by Docket Navigator at 4:58 PM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: special report, year in review

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Navigation

  • Year in Review
  • § 101 Decisions
  • Special Reports
  • Docket Navigator Home Page
  • Follow me on Twitter!

About This Blog

My photo
Docket Navigator
reads every patent infringement litigation docket sheet in the US district courts every day. The posts you see here are a small sampling of the Docket Report...see every noteworthy event in current patent litigation, complete with free links to the underlying orders, by subscribing to the Docket Report daily newsletter.
View my complete profile

Subscribe To

Posts
Atom
Posts
Comments
Atom
Comments

Docket Navigator

Docket Navigator

Blog Roll

  • Delaware IP Law Blog
    The District Court and Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware Announce COVID-19 Precautions
    5 years ago
  • IP Wise
    Brann & Isaacson Recognized Nationally for Leadership in Litigation & Intellectual Property
    1 week ago
  • Patent Prospector
    Aiding Abstraction
    9 years ago
  • Patents Post Grant
    Upcoming PTAB & Patent Policy CLE (Fall '17)
    8 years ago

Blog Archive

  • ►  2018 (168)
    • ►  August (16)
    • ►  July (21)
    • ►  June (23)
    • ►  May (22)
    • ►  April (22)
    • ►  March (23)
    • ►  February (19)
    • ►  January (22)
  • ▼  2017 (291)
    • ►  December (19)
    • ►  November (19)
    • ►  October (22)
    • ►  September (22)
    • ►  August (30)
    • ►  July (26)
    • ►  June (25)
    • ►  May (25)
    • ►  April (21)
    • ►  March (27)
    • ▼  February (27)
      • Lift of Lengthy Stay Pending IPR Warrants Addition...
      • Statistics on District Court 12(b)(6) Motions unde...
      • Apportionment of Royalty Base Appropriate for Proc...
      • PMC Signal Processing Patents Not Ineligible Under...
      • Top Patent Classifications by District Court Deter...
      • Longer License Term Does Not Support Expert’s Incr...
      • New District Court Patent Cases through 2016
      • Willful Infringement Claim Does Not Require Allega...
      • Willful Infringement Claim Requires Allegation of ...
      • Digital Data Remote Mirroring Patent Ineligible Un...
      • Discovery Into Commission History of Intellectual ...
      • Success Rates on Requests to Stay Pending IPR, CBM...
      • Survey Based on Rejected Claim Construction Render...
      • Settlement Enforceable Despite Later Finding of Pa...
      • Nonexistent Redesign Warrants Finding of Contempt ...
      • Number of Patent Litigation Proceedings in 2016
      • Wireless Device Pairing Patents Not Ineligible Und...
      • Plaintiff Sanctioned for Doubling-Down on Unsucces...
      • Top Accused Infringers, Patentees, and Law Firms i...
      • Patent for Changing the Physical Properties of a S...
      • Expert’s Untimely Disclosure in Reply Report Justi...
      • Non-Lawyer Communications Between Patent Buyer and...
      • Top Attorneys in 2016
      • Expert Opinions on the Value of 4G Connectivity Ex...
      • Expert’s Failure to Explain Basis For Hypothetical...
      • Defendant’s Delay in Seeking Summary Judgment Warr...
      • Money Transfer Patents Ineligible Under 35 U.S.C. ...
    • ►  January (28)
  • ►  2016 (272)
    • ►  December (21)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (23)
    • ►  September (22)
    • ►  August (24)
    • ►  July (22)
    • ►  June (23)
    • ►  May (26)
    • ►  April (24)
    • ►  March (25)
    • ►  February (23)
    • ►  January (19)
  • ►  2015 (278)
    • ►  December (20)
    • ►  November (18)
    • ►  October (21)
    • ►  September (21)
    • ►  August (25)
    • ►  July (24)
    • ►  June (27)
    • ►  May (24)
    • ►  April (24)
    • ►  March (28)
    • ►  February (22)
    • ►  January (24)
  • ►  2014 (253)
    • ►  December (21)
    • ►  November (17)
    • ►  October (22)
    • ►  September (21)
    • ►  August (21)
    • ►  July (24)
    • ►  June (21)
    • ►  May (22)
    • ►  April (22)
    • ►  March (21)
    • ►  February (19)
    • ►  January (22)
  • ►  2013 (245)
    • ►  December (21)
    • ►  November (18)
    • ►  October (22)
    • ►  September (19)
    • ►  August (22)
    • ►  July (21)
    • ►  June (20)
    • ►  May (22)
    • ►  April (21)
    • ►  March (20)
    • ►  February (19)
    • ►  January (20)
  • ►  2012 (250)
    • ►  December (18)
    • ►  November (19)
    • ►  October (22)
    • ►  September (19)
    • ►  August (23)
    • ►  July (21)
    • ►  June (20)
    • ►  May (21)
    • ►  April (26)
    • ►  March (20)
    • ►  February (20)
    • ►  January (21)
  • ►  2011 (272)
    • ►  December (16)
    • ►  November (19)
    • ►  October (21)
    • ►  September (38)
    • ►  August (24)
    • ►  July (20)
    • ►  June (27)
    • ►  May (20)
    • ►  April (23)
    • ►  March (23)
    • ►  February (20)
    • ►  January (21)
  • ►  2010 (264)
    • ►  December (22)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (20)
    • ►  September (22)
    • ►  August (22)
    • ►  July (24)
    • ►  June (26)
    • ►  May (21)
    • ►  April (24)
    • ►  March (25)
    • ►  February (19)
    • ►  January (19)
  • ►  2009 (245)
    • ►  December (20)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (21)
    • ►  September (21)
    • ►  August (22)
    • ►  July (21)
    • ►  June (22)
    • ►  May (20)
    • ►  April (20)
    • ►  March (22)
    • ►  February (19)
    • ►  January (17)
  • ►  2008 (43)
    • ►  December (20)
    • ►  November (17)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  January (1)

FEEDJIT Live Page Popularity
All Content Provided by the Patent Litigation Research Database, Docket Navigator
Simple theme. Powered by Blogger.