In granting defendant's motion to transfer, the court rejected plaintiff's argument that the district's "rocket docket" warranted retention of venue. "[A]lthough it may be true that Plaintiff will experience a speedier resolution of its action in this district, the Court cannot ignore the fact that the interest of justice remains on the side of transfer. . . . [I]f the Court were to give such a consideration commanding weight, all cases filed in this district would be effectively immune from transfer."
VIZIO, Inc. v. Funai Electric Company, Ltd., et al., 2-09-cv-00236
(VAED August 7, 2009, Order) (Doumar, J.)