In denying in part a motion to quash by defendant's former CEO, the court rejected the deponent's claim that the deposition "would 'seriously disrupt' the performance of his duties [as an executive for another company] during 'the current travails of the automotive industry. . . .' Though [the witness] may have a busy schedule, [he] has not shown any burden that would sufficiently outweigh Plaintiff’s request for discoverable information through a limited deposition."
Paice, LLC. v. Toyota Motor Corp. et al., 2-07-cv-00180
(TXED July 21, 2009, Order) (Folsom, J.)