Jury verdict of approximately $34 million was reduced 82% to $6.1 million because the jury adopted plaintiff's expert's calculation of damages which was based upon worldwide sales that were "not actually rooted in [defendant's] infringing activity in the United States."
Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc., 1-04-cv-01371 (DED December 12, 2008, Memorandum Opinion)
No comments:
Post a Comment