"[Defendant] is incorrect in asserting the proposition that infringement is the sine qua non for violation of an injunction. Where infringement has been proven, the Court has the power to enjoin conduct that would further infringement but that falls short of infringement."
Broadcom Corp. v. Qualcomm Inc., 8-05-cv-00467 (CACD November 17, 2008, Order)
No comments:
Post a Comment